![]() ![]() Tilt/Shift lenses however allow you to capture more of the subject without having to angle the lens off a level plane so in that respect will give you less distortion when you need to include more of the subject than a regular WA can handle. If you shoot perfectly level on all axes there won't be any difference in distortion between the two. Ideally, and especially for architecture, WA lenses should ONLY be used when perfectly level both in pitch and roll (up/down and side/side) to minimize distortion. It's kind of a complicated topic, but the worst kind of distortion in wide angle lenses occurs when you angle the lens up or down (pitch) so that you can fit more of the subject into the image (such as when you angle the lens up to capture a whole building from relatively close and the top looks much smaller than the bottom). To really do the job right, you'd probably need both. This explanation only refers to the shift feature in T/S lenses, the tilt feature is mostly used to increase/decrease depth of field and is a whole different topic.Īlso, I think you might find a 24mm isn't wide enough indoors, 19mm (or 17mm for Canon) would probably be a better option. For interior architecture most ultra wide angles can cover enough of the room without angling the camera, so a tilt/shift lens isn't necessary, unless you need to include a really high ceiling like in a large cathedral. Tilt/Shift lenses however allow you to capture more of the subject without having to angle the lens off a level plane so in that respect will give you less distortion when you need to include more of the subject than a regular WA can handle. Ideally, and especially for architecture, WA lenses should ONLY be used when perfectly level both in pitch and roll (up/down and side/side) to minimize distortion. For architectural photography you describe you will likely be shooting at f/8 - f/11 so not much use for tilt. Tilt allows you to angle the plane of focus to try and have a larger apparent DOF at larger apertures. With shift I can move the horizon up or down (and also left or right or even at angles). In a non-shifted lens if I set my camera perfectly level then the horizon should split my image in half. You can think of shift like this, the lens makes an image circle far larger than your sensor and you are shifting your sensor relative to that image circle. ![]() If you are really picky about distortion the best way to fix is to stitch symmetrical shifts about the center point so you can effectively do it manually in LR. Luckily the rectilinear distortion present in the 24 is very minimal (and also in the new 19) although not completely absent. The tilt-shift function does not correct rectilinear distortion and in fact is more difficult to correct than a non T-S lens since there are no profiles for it (because it would change with each tilt and shift position). Opposed to shooting it with a 13-35mm and correcting verticals in LR and PS? I'm aware that it corrects the verticals and gives you a larger file size,īut does it change the distortion of an object that might be at the bottom or top edgesįor example: if im shooting inside and office building and there is a tableīottom right, will that image shot with a TS lens have less distortion of the table as I'm trying to fully understand the benefits of using the TS for shooting buildings.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |